There are plenty of Americans who are very skeptical about 911 and the anthrax story. Of course any thinking person quickly figured out that the anthrax could not have come from some foreign source like the CIA and the media wanted the public to believe. And most thinking people also quickly realized that there was a strong connection between the fear created by the anthrax scare in the wake of 911 and the speedy passage of the so-called "Patriot Act."

I once met one of the authors of the "Patriot Act," who was participating in a debate about civil liberties. One of the people in the audience asked him a very important question: "How long were you working on writing your section of the Patriot Act, as it could not have possibly been written in such short time after 911 happened?"

The Patriot Act lawyer danced around the question, but never gave an answer. So I asked him the question again: "It seems that you still haven’t answered an earlier question: when did you first start writing the Patriot Act?" Again, he failed to answer the question.

The reason the lawyer dodged the question repeatedly was because the Patriot Act was obviously written LONG BEFORE 911 and the Anthax scare. The shadow government was obviously waiting for just the right opportunity to introduce it.

On the anthrax scare itself, the most obvious thing that any thinking person would recognize is that nearly all of the victims are people that Bush would have liked to get rid of. None of them could be people on an "enemy list" from some so-called terrorist organization overseas.

And I’m sure that I’m not the only person who wondered what Ivins’ handwriting looked like, having seen samples of the handwriting on letters and envelopes that one of the real insider-terrorist operators prepared. There surely must of been many samples of Ivins’ REAL handwriting available?

Thinking people were not surprised at all that the so-called government "investigators" would NOT produce a SINGLE sample of Ivins’ real handwriting. And the obvious reason for that, I’m sure, is that it looks NOTHING like the handwriting on those letters and envelopes we’ve seen that were sent to liberal members of Congress and to the photo-journalist Bob Stevens, who published a picture of Bush’s drunk daughter Jenna humping another drunk female student in a tabloid publication. (Stevens was the first victim of the anthrax attacks.) Just exactly the person that bin Laden or Ivins would pick, right?

The links below provide plenty of material for thinking people to ponder. As for the posters who "believe" the government’s story, I would suggest that you ask for a 50 cents an hour raise for posting about your "trust" in the government’s lies, or if you are merely genuinely stupid, perhaps you could read just a little bit before posting your silly diatribes.
References :
http://www.newsgarden.org/columns/anthrax/anthraxtargets.shtml

http://www.freefromterror.net/other_articles/gov_anthrax.html

http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=8520

But then I don’t fall all over myself at every conspiracy opportunity.
References :