I need a little help formulating the best answer to this question. Reality is I’m unhappy. The company has long underperformed in the stock market. I am looking for a company with greater chance for financial success. 60 percent of the workforce I manage today is in India, that number increases day-by-day. I think that by changing industries, I may have a more secure future – I don’t think that reason flies.
I plan to avoid the question by merely stating that I am seeking a company that provides me with greater executive/management opportunities.
Trouble is that I know I have those opportunities with my current employer. I’m just sick of the constant cuts in workforce, the bleeding to off-shore and the low performing stock.
$$$$. Lots and lots of dollars is why I would leave my old company.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091226/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_deficit
Yahoo chose to post this crap that is totally irrevelant and chose not to run stories about how Senator Chris Dodd is on the Countrywide realty board of directors (Countrywide and Fannie mae brought us the Mortgage backed Securities and so the economic meltdown last year) or they fail to run any stories about how the House banking committee chairman barney Frank was playing hide the weenie with Fannie Mae executive herb Moses.
But they would run this irrelevent story like it’s a big deal. I think Obama owns every media outlet in the country. Yahoo is just another cog in the propaganda machine. Funny thing about Obama bucks, he had enough in contributions, from sources he never disclosed to end our deficit. he obviously owns the news media, so, who among you is stupid enough to trust Obama or any Democrat?
I think the time for civility is past, this is the time for a balkan style civil war. Lets decide with bullet and bayonet if the country will be communist or a liberal democracy.
the article is newsworthy because it points out that the Republican’s opposition to healthcare reform is inconsistent with their previous positions. If you read it more carefully, even Republicans Voinovich and Snowe concede that inconsistency.
then you say you want to start shooting or stabbling people because you don’t like Obama? Hmm. Sorry but that doesn’t help your credibility much.
i can’t think of anything more unreal…surreal..
Heres hoping she never has to search for love…and that some gentle, wise man will find her for himself.
Los Angeles, Nov 19 (PTI) Scottish singing sensation Susan Boyle is too busy to find time for love and has turned down an offer from a TV reality show who sought to find her perfect match. The 48-year-old singer found fame on reality show ”Britain’’s Got Talent” earlier this year, and famously boasted about remaining single during her adult life, reported OK! magazine online.
Boyle was subsequently approached by TV executives to star in a show to hunt out a potential partner, but she declined. "There’’s no time for that (a boyfriend) now, I”m far too busy," said Boyle."There was a TV company that wanted to set me up with a man. Apparently he was a nice man, but I”ve got my living to do now.
I don”t mind being friendly, but no marriage plans as yet," she added.
http://in.news.yahoo.com/20/20091119/388/ten-susan-boyle-has-no-time-for-love.html
Edit: Bear! Shilpa Shetty will be visiting the UK soon…you can catch her right at your doorstep! : )
Edit: Bear! Hels wouldn’t thumb you down and neither would i. Theres a thumbs down faily lurking on these pages…and don’t you worry, i take your remark in the right spirit…i’m sure you & Shilpa would make sweet music together… : )
Sensible,rather than wise.
I hear they’re doing,’Finding a wife in Bombay’.I’m going to apply for it,because I know this really sexy married woman,that I wouldn’t mind getting my hands on! 
@ Hels – I hope you didn’t give me the thumbs down.Faith will take my answer,in the good humour it was meant.
In the case “A Problem at the Housing Authority,” the author is introduced to several t-junctions in his new position as Executive Director of a County Housing Authority. The critical t-junctions involve a ring of corruption taking place amongst appointed government officials, and negligence and the misappropriation of state and federal dollars. Because the circumstances do not easily outweigh the individual’s response, the appointee is not sure how to respond. I believe that leaking is possibly is the best response to corruption encountered by the appointee. I would likely move out of the city, whistle blow, and then submit a resignation letter. This case study attempts to highlight the critical t-junctions while explaining why leaking would be the best solution to the aforementioned dilemma. Comparisons are created using “George Shultz and the Iran-Contra Affair” and “Agent Rowley Blows the Whistle” to illuminate each concept.
The prospects of power are charming and seductive while its realities are often hidden by those who wish to maintain it. The first t-junction provides a clear example: here the author is appointed by a board of directors who are made up of financial contributors to the state governor’s election campaign. This obviously represents a serious conflict in interest on the part of the governor and the appointed board members. The second t-junction makes clear that the board members, particularly the chairman of the board knowingly engaged in corrupt behavior. The third t-junction occurs when the author discovers that the board secures negotiations with a realty company owned by the chairmans cousins, and the fourth t-junction occurs when the appointee discovers his predecessor was the former campaign manager for the sitting governor. By this t-junction the appointee had an opportunity to distance himself from the corruption by explicitly rejecting such behavior but did not do so out of fear of his own safety.
Each t-junction helped to explain a host of additional corruptions (t-junctions) taking place including: the hiring of a resident to monitor the appointee’s home; the chairman of the board unsuccessful attempt to sale the appointee a house at an obscenely low price, and the overall negligence taking place within the organization (the organization was on the verge of bankruptcy when the author was originally appointed).
The seductive and charming aspects of power led the author to accept a position before doing his homework. This led him to a world of politics characterized by corruption, negligence and nepotism. My opinion is that that the appointee made a wise decision by consulting with a lawyer and considering all of his options, including the risk of personal social, and professional endangerment. Based on the options discussed with the attorney, Leaking appears to be the appointee’s best option. Walking away would have forced the appointee to compromise his moral values and whist blowing could compromise his safety and future career in politics. In the beginning of the text the appointee makes clear that confrontation is not his style, and discussion may not have been a considerable option since he did not know which board members were involved. Leaking is clearly the best option here. The chairman already knew that the appointee was aware of the various scandals taking place. The appointee had the option of sending anonymous letters to local and state representatives revealing his findings. The appointee also had the option to meet personally with an elected official who could champion the matter which may have led him into the clear. His safest option would be to find a different place to work in order to safe guard his personal safety.
It is important that the appointee stay true to himself by maintaining his prior level of integrity. The author must be careful to not allow his circumstances to champion his personal credibility. Agent Rowly and George Slutz blew the whistle for different reason. Rowley blew the whistle to bring attention to deficiencies with the FBI while Slutz made public statements in order to disassociate himself from the Iran-Contra affair. While it is true that Rowley and Slutz each had over 15 years of experience in their perspective fields, each found a way to maintain their level of individual responsibility. The appointee must find a creative solution for maintaining his individual level of responsibility. He must understand, most importantly, that there are no definitive solutions. He must be prepared to win and lose no matter what the results may be
Good paper. If you are looking for grammar and punctuation here goes…1.board of directors COMPRISED of financial contributors.
2. Serious conflict OF interest-
3. particularly the chairman of the board, use comma after
4. corruption, negligence, and nepotism use comma
5. personal, social, and professional
6.leaking, no capital letter
7.moral values and WHISTLE blowing- you forgot the LE
8.safest option WOULD HAVE BEEN, not would be
9.blew the whistle for A different reason
10.results may be. Use period at end of sentence.
These are in the order I found them. Hope this helped. Good Luck. Well done!
Seriously, I just decided to check out Phenomenom and AGAIN there is some guy I have never seen before with a British accent as the host. Do network executives think the American public have more respect for someone with an accent? Do they think we will be more likely to watch? I feel the opposite. I am not a big fan of reality TV anyway but this approach really puts me off. Am I the only one who feels this way?
I personally find this practice insulting.
Yep I can tell you, because American Idol is the most highly rated Reality Show, so everyone is trying to find someone that’s just like Simon.
In the case “A Problem at the Housing Authority,” the author is introduced to several t-junctions in his new position as Executive Director of a County Housing Authority. The critical t-junctions involve a ring of corruption taking place amongst appointed government officials, and negligence and the misappropriation of state and federal dollars. Because the circumstances do not easily outweigh the individual’s response, the appointee is not sure how to respond. I believe that leaking is possibly is the best response to corruption encountered by the appointee. I would likely move out of the city, whistle blow, and then submit a resignation letter. This case study attempts to highlight the critical t-junctions while explaining why leaking would be the best solution to the aforementioned dilemma. Comparisons are created using “George Shultz and the Iran-Contra Affair” and “Agent Rowley Blows the Whistle” to illuminate each concept.
The prospects of power are charming and seductive while its realities are often hidden by those who wish to maintain it. The first t-junction provides a clear example: here the author is appointed by a board of directors who are made up of financial contributors to the state governor’s election campaign. This obviously represents a serious conflict in interest on the part of the governor and the appointed board members. The second t-junction makes clear that the board members, particularly the chairman of the board knowingly engaged in corrupt behavior. The third t-junction occurs when the author discovers that the board secures negotiations with a realty company owned by the chairmans cousins, and the fourth t-junction occurs when the appointee discovers his predecessor was the former campaign manager for the sitting governor. By this t-junction the appointee had an opportunity to distance himself from the corruption by explicitly rejecting such behavior but did not do so out of fear of his own safety.
Each t-junction helped to explain a host of additional corruptions (t-junctions) taking place including: the hiring of a resident to monitor the appointee’s home; the chairman of the board unsuccessful attempt to sale the appointee a house at an obscenely low price, and the overall negligence taking place within the organization (the organization was on the verge of bankruptcy when the author was originally appointed).
The seductive and charming aspects of power led the author to accept a position before doing his homework. This led him to a world of politics characterized by corruption, negligence and nepotism. My opinion is that that the appointee made a wise decision by consulting with a lawyer and considering all of his options, including the risk of personal social, and professional endangerment. Based on the options discussed with the attorney, Leaking appears to be the appointee’s best option. Walking away would have forced the appointee to compromise his moral values and whist blowing could compromise his safety and future career in politics. In the beginning of the text the appointee makes clear that confrontation is not his style, and discussion may not have been a considerable option since he did not know which board members were involved. Leaking is clearly the best option here. The chairman already knew that the appointee was aware of the various scandals taking place. The appointee had the option of sending anonymous letters to local and state representatives revealing his findings. The appointee also had the option to meet personally with an elected official who could champion the matter which may have led him into the clear. His safest option would be to find a different place to work in order to safe guard his personal safety.
It is important that the appointee stay true to himself by maintaining his prior level of integrity. The author must be careful to not allow his circumstances to champion his personal credibility. Agent Rowly and George Slutz blew the whistle for different reason. Rowley blew the whistle to bring attention to deficiencies with the FBI while Slutz made public statements in order to disassociate himself from the Iran-Contra affair. While it is true that Rowley and Slutz each had over 15 years of experience in their perspective fields, each found a way to maintain their level of individual responsibility. The appointee must find a creative solution for maintaining his individual level of responsibility. He must understand, most importantly, that there are no definitive solutions. He must be prepared to win and lose no matter what the results may be.
I have a series of essay questions so i need all the help i can get. If there is a website where i can have my papers proofread, please let me know!
Leaking is anonoumosly reporting info. to the media.
whistle blowing is reporting to a higher official/ may also be seen as tattle telling.
Hi, Jatice ~
I’m having trouble posting my long answer. Please email me by clicking on my profile and I will send you a paste of my suggestions.
Thanks for the definitions of "leaking" and "whistle-blowing."
Can you also find a way to elaborate on what is meant by a "t-junction?"
I noticed that you say in one place that you think LEAKING is his best option, but later you say that you would likely move out of the city, WHISTLE BLOW, and submit a letter of resignation. I presume this is a kind of typo.
Paula Cirulli delivers her 30-second commercial following egoSPHERE’s “Light’s, Camera, Call-To-Action” workshop.
Duration : 0:0:38
Read the rest of this entry »
http://www.mikefinkkansascityrealestate.com Mike Fink 913-579-7220 Realty Executives Real Estate Agent Residential Realtor Kansas City, Missouri Overland Park, KS
Duration : 0:0:36
Read the rest of this entry »
http://www.tourfactory.com/s431842/r_www.youtube.com
For more information, contact:
Judi Starliper
(865) 693-3232
Realty Executives Associates
NORAS PATH SUBDIVISION! Hardin Valley! Better than new 2 year old brick beauty in immaculate condition. 4 Bedrooms and bonus. Open living room/dining room. 2 Story tall ceilings in foyer. Family room with 2-story tall ceiling and fireplace. Its open to kitchen with 18 tiled flooring, granite countertops, hickory cabinets and pantry. Main master with trey ceilings and beautiful bath with granite tops, whirlpool and separate shower. Plantation shutters throughout. Security, irrigation front and back. Liquid granite on patio and garage floor. Gutter guards added. Great location between Oak Ridge and Knoxville.
Duration : 0:5:30
Read the rest of this entry »
Welcome to Realty Executives of Greater Augusta. Not only can the expert professionals at Realty Executives help you buy or sell real estate, they have extensive community information that helps buyers and investors get a good sense of the bigger picture around each property. These Augusta, GA, agents are eager to satisfy your commercial, residential or property management real estate needs and to protect your interests.
Visit us http://www.yellowpages.com/info-19027448/Realty-Executives-Augusta?from=youtb
Duration : 0:1:25
Read the rest of this entry »